IVC Filter Lawsuit Funding and Lawsuit Help
As a matter of fact, Legal-Bay is a leader in IVC Filter pre settlement lawsuit funding. Additionally, we can assist you in finding an IVC Filter law firm or IVC Filter lawyer. If you are unsure if you have a claim against C.R. Bard Inc. or Cook Medical Inc., then contact us.

What Are IVC Filters?
Accordingly, IVC filters (Inferior Vena Cava filters) are “medical devices used to help prevent pulmonary embolisms by catching blood clots and keeping them from traveling to the lungs.”

IVC IV Filter Lawsuit Funding – Claims against C.R. Bard Inc. and Cook Medical Inc.
According to court records, the number of active claims jumped from 189 in October to 222 in November. For that reason, these lawsuits all have similar allegations, claiming that C.R. Bard Inc. and Cook Medical Inc. failed to alert patients of the IVC filter malfunctions. Consequently, if the filters break, tilt, or migrate from the initial insertion position, then they risk puncturing the lungs, heart, or inferior vena cava.
Different pretrial proceedings are already underway against the two manufacturers.
At the present time, the lawsuit claims against C.R. Bard over its recovery and G2 IVC filters are consolidated in the U.S. District Court in the District of Arizona. Meanwhile, the claims against Cook Medical Inc. are pending in a multidistrict litigation (MDL 2570) in the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Indiana.
FDA WARNINGS & Side Effects
Evidently, the FDA received more than 900 reports of adverse events since 2005. Shown below are some studies and reports with data collected on IVC filters:
A study in 2010 published in the Archives of Internal Medicine “found that nearly half of all IVC filter implantation surgeries were necessary. Thirteen percent (203) of the 1,547 people from Worcester, MA diagnosed with acute venous thromboembolism were given IVC filters as part of their treatment. Researchers found that a quarter of those patients did not need the filter and were unable to reach a consensus on the remaining 23 percent of cases. Furthermore, they found that IVC filter patients had a much higher in-hospital mortality rate (nearly double) and urged that further research be conducted to establish clearer guidelines for use,
according to Surgical Watch re:
IVC Filter lawsuits.
In August 2010, the FDA announced that patients filed 921 adverse event reports, indicating that there were 328 instances of filter migration, 146 device detachments, 70 inferior vena cava perforations, and 56 filter fractures. The FDA expressed concern that the retrievable IVC filters are short-term solutions, and patients often keep these filters until the risk for pulmonary embolism subsides. They recommended that surgeons remove the devices as soon as possible. This safety communication was reiterated in 2014,
according to Surgical Watch re:
IVC Filter lawsuits.
Complaints kept pouring in…
Researchers looked at 952 IVC filter patients at Boston Medical Center from August 2003 to February 2011. Of 679 retrievable filters, surgeons only removed 8.5 percent successfully. Retrieval attempts were unsuccessful in 18.3 percent of cases. Overall, patients suffered 74 venous thrombotic events, including 25 pulmonary emboli that occurred with the filters in place. Researchers noted that “many IVC filters placed after trauma were inserted when the highest bleeding risk had subsided, and anticoagulant therapy may have been appropriate,
according to Surgical Watch re:
IVC Filter lawsuits.
C.R. Bard began receiving complaints of device loosening, fracturing and migration as early as 2004. Without reporting their concerns to the FDA, the company instead consulted with Dr. John Lehmann to compare newer models to older models to see if they had improved the rate of failure. This internally circulated document was not meant for release to plaintiffs, but was accidentally disclosed and later redacted. If the report is allowed in court proceedings, it could suggest manufacturer negligence and failure to warn the public of known risks,
according to Surgical Watch re:
IVC Filter lawsuits.
As a matter of fact, there are many other complications and injuries from IVC filters. Furthermore, some of the dangerous side effects that IVC filters can cause include:
- Device Migration
- Device Breakage
- Perforated Blood Vessels & Organs
Legal-Bay is here to help you with your IVC Filter Pre Settlement Lawsuit Funding needs
For those who have a lawsuit filed
Accordingly, if you, or a loved one, have a lawyer and a lawsuit against C.R. Bard Inc. or Cook Medical Inc. and you need lawsuit funding today, then Legal-Bay can help you right now. Legal-Bay can fund up to $25K in pre settlement lawsuit funding on most IVC Filter lawsuit claims. All things considered, applying for funding is easy. To apply for pre settlement lawsuit funding, fill out the pre-application on the upper left hand side of this page. Alternatively, you can call Legal-Bay’s toll free hotline at: 866.792.0234, and speak to a live agent about your IVC Filter questions.
For those who don’t have a lawsuit filed
At any rate, if you have do not have a lawyer yet, and you believe you are suffering injuries and complications from an IVC filter, then Legal-Bay can provide you with a free IVC Filter legal consultation or free case evaluation with a nationally recognized IVC Filter law firm or IVC Filter lawyer. First thing to remember is the free case evaluation costs you nothing. The attorney will only charge you if they receive a lawsuit settlement award for you. Fill out the application on the upper left hand side of this page, or call our toll-free hotline at: 866.792.0234. We have live agents can work with you to obtain an IVC Filter attorney to speak with.